Unit 5 · Topics 5.1 · 5.5 / EBQ skill focus

Support a bounded claim

Connect evidence to different psychological concepts.

About 12 minutes · Original short practice · Untimed

The stimulus / Keep it in view

Coping approaches and evidence

Fictional teaching sources for evidence reasoning. No personal health disclosure or treatment decision is requested.

Source A · Reappraisal practice

In a fictional randomized study, 72 adults practice interpreting a challenging task as manageable or complete a time-matched neutral activity. On a later identical task, mean self-reported stress is 4 versus 6 on a 0–10 scale. No inferential test is given.

Source B · Graduated exposure

A different fictional randomized study assigns 64 consenting adults with a narrowly defined fear to clinician-supervised graduated exposure or a time-matched comparison. Mean fear ratings decrease by 3 points versus 1 on the same scale. During sessions, participants encounter the feared but safe situation without the predicted harmful event. This summary omits many clinical details.

Source C · Social support

A survey of 300 adult volunteers finds an association between reported social support and lower stress. No intervention or random assignment occurs.

Mark useful evidence, then explain what it helps you establish.

Start with the evidence.

Question 1 / 2

Which explanation applies a psychological concept to Source A?A has seventy-two participants, so its conclusion is universal.Every lower stress score proves a cure.Reappraisal can change how a demand is interpreted, helping explain different stress ratings.The source measures neurotransmitter concentration directly.

Question 2 / 2

What is an appropriate limitation when using Source C?The association does not show that support caused lower stress.Every survey is useless.Participants were randomly assigned to support levels.It proves Source A is false.

A short written explanation

Using Sources A and B, support a cautious claim that psychological processes can influence emotional responses. Apply two different concepts and state a limit.

Open a sentence starting point

The sources suggest ___. In A, ___ can explain ___. In B, ___ can explain ___. The evidence does not establish ___.

0 words · Write at least 12 before opening the revision guide. Written reasoning is reviewed by a teacher.

Support a bounded claim · Student practice record

Support a bounded claim · AP Psychology

Unit 5 · Topics 5.1, 5.5 · In progress

Mode: guided. Hints opened: 0.

Source A · Reappraisal practice
In a fictional randomized study, 72 adults practice interpreting a challenging task as manageable or complete a time-matched neutral activity. On a later identical task, mean self-reported stress is 4 versus 6 on a 0–10 scale. No inferential test is given.

Source B · Graduated exposure
A different fictional randomized study assigns 64 consenting adults with a narrowly defined fear to clinician-supervised graduated exposure or a time-matched comparison. Mean fear ratings decrease by 3 points versus 1 on the same scale. During sessions, participants encounter the feared but safe situation without the predicted harmful event. This summary omits many clinical details.

Source C · Social support
A survey of 300 adult volunteers finds an association between reported social support and lower stress. No intervention or random assignment occurs.

Evidence marked: None

Question 1: Which explanation applies a psychological concept to Source A?
First checked response: Not checked

Question 2: What is an appropriate limitation when using Source C?
First checked response: Not checked

WRITING PROMPT
Using Sources A and B, support a cautious claim that psychological processes can influence emotional responses. Apply two different concepts and state a limit.

FIRST DRAFT
Not written

REVISED RESPONSE
Not written

REVISION NOTE
Not written

SELF-REVIEW
Use accurate findings from both named sources.: Not reviewed
Apply cognitive reappraisal and exposure/extinction learning distinctly.: Not reviewed
State a limit without offering personal treatment advice.: Not reviewed

TRANSFER
A second explanation repeats “changing thoughts” for both sources without addressing exposure. What is the best repair?
Not checked

Choice checks: 0/2. Transfer: Not checked. Written work requires teacher review; these are not AP points.

Fictional teaching sources for evidence reasoning. No personal health disclosure or treatment decision is requested.