The Resolution Workbench

Your starting point

Evaluate collective action by separating decision rules, implementation, and outcomes.

The United Nations Charter was signed on June 26, 1945, and entered into force on October 24. It created an organization through which states could address peace, security, and other shared concerns. Its purposes are not evidence that every effort succeeds. Member governments retain interests, resources, and disagreements that shape what institutions can do.

Under the present Security Council voting system, a substantive decision requires at least nine affirmative votes and no negative vote by a permanent member. A permanent member’s abstention does not block adoption if the required affirmative votes are present. These simplified practice cases concern substantive decisions; procedural votes and other Charter provisions require separate attention. The voting rule used here is the current rule, not the Council’s original 1945 size and threshold.

At this workbench, you inspect fictional proposals and monitoring reports. A vote answers whether a proposal was adopted under the supplied rule. Effectiveness asks additional questions: Were agreed actions carried out? Did conditions improve? Were affected communities heard? Could the changes have other causes? Your final recommendation must use evidence instead of assuming that either a successful vote or disagreement proves everything about the organization.

Take your time. You can reopen these notes during any task. Work stays on this page; leaving or reloading clears it.