Letter-size paper. The PDF is ready to print; the web pages below contain the same selected tasks. Turn off browser headers and footers when printing this page.
CLSM · World History · Progress Check 5
Japanese American Incarceration
Read the situation. Connect the ideas. Show how you know.
Name ___________________________Class __________ Date __________
01 Recall, then make a connection.
Exclusion order
Incarceration
Redress
Connect an exclusion order with incarceration while keeping their meanings distinct. What could redress acknowledge or address, and why would it not erase the original consequences?
Read the situation.
Japanese American advocates and others pursued acknowledgment and redress for decades. The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 apologized for the injustice and provided redress for eligible survivors. It did not restore lost years or make every consequence disappear. This is a document inquiry, with no reenactment, victim roleplay, or competition over suffering. Your task is to trace how a policy affected rights and settlement patterns, then explain what later acknowledgment could and could not address.
02 Organize the information.
The policy and redress file
Use the supplied anchors; the broad 1942 entry concerns implementation after the executive order.
Arrange the entries.
February 19, 1942: Roosevelt signs Executive Order 9066.
Later in 1942: Exclusion orders force Japanese Americans from West Coast communities into confinement.
1988: The Civil Liberties Act acknowledges injustice and authorizes redress.
December 7, 1941: Japan attacks Pearl Harbor.
Write the letters in order:
→→→
Explain why one step or event belongs where you put it.
CLSM · World History · Progress Check 5
What does the evidence show?
Japanese American Incarceration
03 Follow the evidence.
Test the voluntary-migration label
A draft describes the movement as an ordinary voluntary relocation.
Select all evidence that challenges that description.
Military exclusion orders required people to leave designated areas.
Guarded confinement restricted people’s freedom to leave.
A government document used the term “relocation.”
A map shows that the destination was farther inland.
Name the useful records and explain how they answer the claim.
04 Apply the idea.
What can acknowledgment repair?
A final exhibit label says: “The 1988 law erased every consequence of incarceration.”
Which revision is more accurate?
The law acknowledged injustice and provided redress for eligible survivors, while losses of time, opportunity, and community could not simply be undone.
An apology means the original policy had never restricted anyone’s rights.
Because harm cannot be fully undone, acknowledgment has no possible significance.
Choose a conclusion and explain why it fits the situation.
05 Carry the idea forward.
Write an exhibit explanation connecting wartime policy, racial targeting, a geographic change, and a rights violation. Include a distinction between the order’s wording and implementation, then evaluate one significance and one limit of redress.