CLSM · World History · Progress Check 1
Islamic Empires
Read the situation. Connect the ideas. Show how you know.
01 Recall, then make a connection.
Explain how a patron’s commission could communicate an empire’s authority. Why does religious diversity require evidence beyond the message that one ruler wanted an artwork to convey?
Read the situation.
Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal rulers governed distinct empires with different political histories and populations. Sharing connections with Islam did not make their governments or subjects identical. The Safavid dynasty established Shi’a Islam as the official religion of its state; Ottoman rulers developed their own institutions. Mughal courts governed a religiously diverse population in South Asia.
02 Organize the information.
Return the record to its folder
Use the briefing: Ottoman complexes combined several functions; Safavid state religion was Shi’a Islam; Akbar employed artists from varied backgrounds.
Match the records to the case.
A. Ottoman exampleB. Safavid exampleC. Mughal example
| Example | Category letter |
|---|---|
| 1. An imperial mosque complex includes educational and commercial functions. | |
| 2. The state officially adopts Shi’a Islam under its founding dynasty. | |
| 3. Akbar commissions illustrated manuscripts through a diverse workshop. | |
| 4. A royal Iranian manuscript project draws on earlier court studios. | |
| 5. Artists under Akbar combine Persian and Indian visual elements. |
Explain one placement using a detail from the example.